OYENTE

Alex

  • 16
  • opiniones
  • 5
  • votos útiles
  • 268
  • calificaciones

Very interesting and informative on unique information. Reader was very good.

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-16-24

Audio quality was subpar but not horrible. Reader also had 1 or 2 moments where they stumbled on reading.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Someone that understands the core problem

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-27-23

Even in the case of those thought of as leading writers on this subject, it feels like they don't actually understand the problem. Warren Farel, as an example, seems to see the problem as something that needs men to solve by being taught responsibility. The author of this book is different, she gets it, it is not that men don't understand responsibility, we don't see any benefit to it.

Even in the case that I see men who are happy with their marriage, they work hard, work long hours, and suffer health issues. Everything seems stacked against us, a lot of women and society as a whole see us as resources to be used up.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Cathartic but misguided.

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-14-23

While I certainly appreciate seeing a feminist realize that something is wrong, the author's book ultimately falls into the same trap that has lead to those she is trying to speak out against. In particular, her attempts to divorce the suffragettes from modern feminism is no help to her cause as it is the very philosophy of that movement that has allowed the modern "gender centric" feminists to metastasize. If your stated philosophy is that men as a whole have been evil to women and that women not being able to engage in certain spheres is solely the cause of misogyny, then you've already gone down the wrong road.

The author does in fact bring up people who talk about this being a myth but she doesn't seem to want to believe it. One part of the book that highlights this is when the question of why male professors dont fight back against the "gender feminists" and she talks about how it was inviting to assume it is yet more male sexism, sounding disappointed that it isn't, yet even her less polarizing conclusion is that "they don't want to cause a scene" as if it's just laziness, a failure of men to take charge when they've been expressly told to not take charge. In other words, everything is the fault of men, again, the onus for change is placed on men despite the power being in the female court of the field.

Another problem I had is this overall focus on how "gender feminists" make the "equity feminists" look bad rather than how this movement effects the relationship between men and women or it's effects on either sex in particular.

So long as history is framed as being filled with nothing but persecution and injustice inflicted on women by men when it is much more often a case of most men and women being persecuted and having injustices perpetrated on them, then the "gender centric" feminists will continue to exist.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Numbers, Numbers, Numbers

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-09-23

I am sure there is a lot of great individual wolf stories in this book, so it's a shame I HAVE NO IDEA WHO IS WHO. This was a problem that was creeping up in the previous book in the series but now it comes out in full force. The author should have referred to wolves by actual names, even if they were not what researchers actually called them at the time, they needed names for this book. One of the ways you can dehumanize people is to call them by a number rather than a name, now call wolves by a number, beings you are trying to "humanize" and show the personalities of, and you get this.

How am I or anyone else supposed to know 459 from 621, or 333 from 518? We can't, and it makes it so death and success have no emotional weight to them, the wolves are no longer individuals, they are just members of whatever pack they are from. The only one I knew who was, was 302 and only because he is the title wolf. Using numbers was fine in the first book. The numbers were single or double digits and the number of wolves was small. Once you get to triple digits though, the book starts falling apart and this was creeping in with the second book already, but it at least had two double digit wolves as the core of the book.

I have no idea why no one, the author or proof readers, thought of how huge a mistake this was. It's ironic how the nob-collared wolves, the ones that were hardest for the researchers to keep track of, were the easiest for me since they gave them actual names based on their appearance.

This is a mess and is a disservice to the wolves the author cared about and runs directly against their desire to make people care about them.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The second greatest wolf of Yellowstone

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-08-23

I really enjoyed The Rise of Wolf 8 and was looking forward to seeing how 21 would rise to something even greater than his father but after finishing the book, I felt a bit let down. The author engage in a lot more conjecture and conjecture with no first hand observation to back it up and it makes some of his conclusions feel hollow. It also didn't help that he mentions that there is a statue of a wolf in Yellowstone and that, instead of 21 or 8, the wolves he spent so much time noting the greatness of, it's of 42. It also didn't help that, rather than call the relationship of the alpha wolves what it is, what he describes, he says it's matriarchal and that the alpha female is always the leader and most important. It feels like a slap to the face of what the alpha wolves did.

A much more brass tacks problem is that the author should have started referring to the numbered wolves by actual names. It was already difficult to keep track of some of the wolves in the previous book, but once we entered the triple digits, it became extremely hard to know what wolf he is talking about.

Finally, I never saw why 21 was considered greater than 8. I still feel like 8 was the greatest given his accomplishments while being at a physical disadvantage in so many instances, while 21, while a great wolf, was also working with more odds in his favor.

Good book, but not as good as the first in the series.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Good at underlining a problem but poor solutions

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-07-23

While the author is very good at analyzing problem groups but it her proposed solutions seem just as divorced from reality as those of the people she criticizes. Boys and men caught between a group that hates them and another that wants them to be moral and also sacrifice themselves won't be receptive to her message. The world wants men to destroy themselves for the sake of it but also gain nothing in return. Work, fight, die and don't ask for anything in return is a demoralizing message. The issue is that moral boys run into a world that tells them to achieve and burn themselves out for a world that at best is disinterested in them, leading to lethargy, while the immoral ones achieve and succeed because they ignore the moral messages and do what the world asks of them while gaining benefits because they can use shortcuts and tricks to lessen the burden and force it to give them rewards.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Padded and meandering

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-02-23

I am a reader that enjoys learning, I also enjoy learning about the thing a book advertises. I came to this book with excitement to learn about a little talked of animal but found a book that put the cart before the horse and talks about everything AROUND the scarabs, while the animal that is supposedly the subject of the book serves more as a throughline for other topics.

Religion, the lives of scientists, and other tangents feature more heavily in the book and it takes a long time to get to the meat of the eponymous insect. The book also has bizarre statements in it like Christopher Columbus believing he'd discovered the Garden of Eden when he arrived in the new world that, along with other strange religious fixations, make for me questioning the author's education and focus.

I have been hesitant to buy many books on insects because of their descriptions and summaries also giving the impression that they have more interest in other things. Whether it be an author wanting to talk about themselves, religion, society, or to some kind of environmental advocacy ( Which is important, but I'm already convinced, I want knowledge, not a political lecture), most of the books on insects are either not confident in their subject or not interested in their subject, like this one.

If you wish to read a book about insects, ACTUALLY, about insects, then buy Life on a Little Known Planet, the rare exception to this trend.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Very helpful, and insightful but somewhat marred

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-31-23

I would like to give this book 5 stars, but two things brought it down, one understandable and the other a mistake on the author's part. The good is that Farrel has done an excellent job of understanding what's going on with men, like myself, who've grown up in the last 30 or so years. My feelings on how the promise of responsibility coming with money and prestige ring hollow in today's world made me know I wasn't just wanting to slack or anything, but that I AM indeed seeing something that's there, was revelatory.

But there are two problems, as I said. The first is that the book focusses on parenting and dad's with a much more minimal analysis of society. In the early chapters this is covered more but it falls away as it goes on. But I understand this part, marriage counseling is something he does, it makes sense to focus on this.

The other problem is both small and huge. Its small for how little space it took up in the book but huge in undermining his arguments. I don't think he should have ever mentioned homosexual couples in regards to parenting. So much of the book is about the importance of uniquely male and female attributes when it comes to family life, he is very specific about the behaviors that come from a mom or dad, yet he broached the same sex parent topic and undermined everything else in his book because of it. His argument was to say there are problems with research for and against homosexual parenting, a neutral thing to say, but then said that same sex couples bring unique strengths that make up for their deficiencies. So which is it? Are both men and women needed for a healthy family and better men, or have we just not provided enough government help to offset the lack of a father and mother. This small thing done me out of my deep introspection from the book and I really think he was better off not bringing it up. It didn't "ruin" the book, but it helped prevent me from giving full stars. Keep in mind, my issue is not with the topic of homosexual couples but that it provides a loophole for certain, loud, and hateful activists to justify not addressing the issue "We don't need to help the men, they just aren't trying hard enough and we can solve it another way" while the government will see it as a reason to just throw more money at systems to support single mothers since that's easier than having to create new solutions.

Edit: I have reduced my rating for the book even further because of what it calls for as solutions. It feels as if the author just can't give actual solutions and might even know they can't but feel helpless, because of their position in the feminist movement and politics. To the question of how to help men that feel devalued and purposeless in a world that wants to use them and throw them away while claiming they had all the power and ability to do so... is to tell them to do what they were already being told, suck it up and be a man.

An example of this is how he points out that women misunderstand how father's parent their children, but instead of making a call for women to understand this, he places all the impetus on men to explain this. This only works as a solution if one assumes men haven't already tried to explain and been dismissed by women and society. If you want men to pull themselves up, you need to get the person with a boot on their throat to realize they're not helping.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Picking Up Audiolibro Por Robin Nagle arte de portada
  • Picking Up
  • On the Streets and Behind the Trucks with the Sanitation Workers of New York City
  • De: Robin Nagle
  • Narrado por: Mary Kane

Good information, hard to tolerate the author

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-24-23

A lot of good information about an oft overlooked job, but it's also really hard to listen to many times because of the condescending, smarmy, and arrogant attitude that is in no way helped by the reader going all in on playing it up even more. It undercuts a person's point that there are people being treated badly and condescended to while they engage in their own never ending barrage of smug condescension.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Too clinical and filled with misandrism

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-24-23

While the book can be quite informative, I feel like it does two things that hold it back. One is how clinical the book is, which pushes away the casual reader and the other is the author's outdated and uneducated views of men and women, which pushes away the more analytical reader. Viewing the world through that weird lens that so many people do, where they bemoan capitalism while placing the worth of a person in their ability to earn capital had me rolling my eyes. I've heard the song and seen the dance of how I'm an evil and horrible person inherently because I'm a man too much to want to listen to a misandrism prattle on about in my free time. Further, the way in general that they refer to the people that work in these jobs, as if they are enemies for her to infiltrate the ranks of, is part of the dry, clinical problem, where the author feels robotic.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup