OYENTE

Mike Crowley

  • 3
  • opiniones
  • 1
  • voto útil
  • 14
  • calificaciones

Great fun

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-02-17

Where does Good Omens rank among all the audiobooks you’ve listened to so far?

Top twenty

Who was your favorite character and why?

Crowley, lovable demon

Which character – as performed by Martin Jarvis – was your favorite?

Adam

If you were to make a film of this book, what would the tag line be?

William and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

Any additional comments?

An obvious homage to Richmal Crompton's 'Just William' books blended with Gaiman spookiness and Pratchett kookiness.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Marred by poor reading

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-13-17

What would have made Indiscretions of Archie better?

A reader who was familiar with the idioms, cadences and pronunciation of English speech, especially the upper class of the period. For instance, the intensifier, "dashed", is to be pronounced "dash'd", not "dash_ed". And the reader's habit of articulating every single syllable may be how the reader *imagines* Englishmen speak but it is at odds with actual British speech patterns. A case in point is the verbal filler "don't you know". It should come out as a flat "donchaknow" not as finely enunciated "don't you know?".

In short, the reading was painful to endure.

Would you be willing to try another book from P. G. Wodehouse? Why or why not?

Certainly. He is one of my favourite authors

How could the performance have been better?

Another, preferably British, reader.

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from Indiscretions of Archie?

None.

Any additional comments?

This is a decidedly minor Wodehouse work but as it is an early one so that in itself makes it worthy of note. Also, the character of Archie, a dim, feckless yet amiable member of the upper class prefigures in many ways Wodehouse's most famous creation, Bertie Wooster. Were it not for these points I could not have forced myself to endure the atrocious reading.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Funny voices, misread lines

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-11-15

Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

No. The narrator mis-read too many sentences and mis-pronounced too many words.

What other book might you compare A Damsel in Distress to and why?

This novel seems to be a precursor to the Blandings Castle series by the same author.

How could the performance have been better?

I would have preferred that the narrator keep the funny voices to the dialog. Reading the entire book with a fake upper-class accent is not only unnecessary it is intensely irritating. It sounds like a bad Tim Curry impersonation.

Apart from which, the narrator seems incapable of reading more than a few words ahead. Given the unpredictable nature of Wodehouse's long sentences, this failing produces many inappropriate pauses and meaningless fragmentary phrases. I don't know what to suggest to remedy this - learn to read, perhaps?

Did A Damsel in Distress inspire you to do anything?

Throw a boot at the stereo.

Any additional comments?

Grrrr!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup