OYENTE

Philip

  • 17
  • opiniones
  • 37
  • votos útiles
  • 133
  • calificaciones

Guns, Germs and Steel was better

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-19-23

Nothing original in this slog of a book. It's hard for me to find the diamond in the dung hill here. I was bored 100% off the time. And the writing was superfluous and needlessly supercilious.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

loved it.

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-03-23

amazing read. it's a synthesis of ancient wisdom, mystic experience while being modern and approachable.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

crap

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-26-22

if you're looking for a crap read you'd probably keep looking. this book isn't even a good distraction to turn your mind off.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

hard to hear

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-19-22

I found the book very hard to listen to. I think reading it on the printed page would have helped a lot. There is a lot of dense material here and not meant for a casual intellectual stroll. The style of the prose, its tone, its voice shifts frequently between various texts, times, cultures, and traditions making it very hard to follow. I'm sure much of it is quite brilliant for this with the stamina to keep up.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

a terrible book

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-24-22

this book may have been better were it not for the corporate sounding "motivational" narrator. I found it annoying the whole time. The book was painful from start to finish. Filled with odes to the obvious and facile recapitulations of well known ideas. a turd of the highest order.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

not good science. writing is decent.

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-05-22

I couldn't finish it. too much crap. I think there is some truth in this but it's sprinkled amongst the bullshit.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

facile, patronizing and preachy

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-26-22

It's scary how many people find this to be an important work. I'll have to respectfully disagree. This is a book for idiots who enjoy being treated like a child. I was able to endure a couple of hours but ultimately had to throw in the towel. Just too much. It was like drinking from a fire hose of bullshit.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 3 personas

kill me

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-07-21

this book sucked. Not sure what masochistic tendencies kept me listening for so long, but those are hours I will never get back. I really like Stoicism but this book was just a rambling laundry list of quotes with no overarching trajectory. Felt rambling and facile.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Lots of unscientific Woo. He offers many plausible

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-27-21

testable hypothesis, and blames the scientific, materialist paradigm for not proving the correctness of them. How about Wallace conducts the experiments himself. With his level of lucid dream attainment that shouldn't be a problem. Prove them wrong. Offer up some evidence. That's his whole bit right?

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Very hard to follow. Even harder to care.

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-07-21

Very hard to follow even harder to care. I love Sean Carroll overall but this was a sludging read.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup