OYENTE

Kat'm

  • 9
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 56
  • calificaciones

Disturbingly Speculative

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-28-24

The author offers a great optimistic vision and way forward for the possibilities of AI and to a large extent Nano Technology. However, the speculation is way too much that at times it boarderlines hubris and a type of self assured arrogance I have not seen other authors portray. The last chapters on his response to criticisms on AI limitations is telling. The author simply claims, that such technologies will be created and will be more intelligent to prevent harm. Such trivializations, is what makes this philosophy deeply disturbing, and given the fixation on AGI by Silicon Valley today.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The need for Deep understanding.

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-16-24

The need for AI Deep understanding, is critical ti any future AI system with real world applications.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Shockingly relevant today!

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-09-24

Truly a prequel for current events, the infrastructure is already made, and now that they are in power, sheets are going to heat the funs!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Emphasis on AI limitations.

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-12-24

Missed out on philosophy of Mind and how it plays into many of AI determinism notions being pushed by Ray Kurzweil et al.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Great but...

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-21-24

Some language is troubling, Africans as savages, primitive, then the barbaric, etc. I understand it was written in the 1960s...

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Great insights

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-17-24

The performance wasn't good especially in the beginning chapters but improved in the mid to end chapters.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A very dogmatic physicalism position

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-30-23

Very disappointed with the book. It happens to be a collection of physicalism views about the universe and reality, repeating materialism notions that have been debunked. At the end of the book BG tries to provide some physicalism religion, "tough guys face facts" but still there is no meaning, yet he struggles with explaining what this all means, that we are just particles, no floating around but gain meaning after some combination of these particles agree to do so. I found such articulations nonsensical and the whole project ends up painting just darkness and aimlessness. reminding me of Schopenhauer's darkness and Nietzsche' s life has no meaning narratives. I also wonder why the deteste for religion, the religious folks told us that death has been appointed for all humans and BG writes a book to tell us the same. Nothing new here!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Social Aspect is important

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-01-22

Great topic, discussion, and storytelling about ACEs, the solutions provided are accessible to most. However, I will state why I gave the book 4 stars. My only critique is that the Dr. seems to brush aside the compounded social aspect component of accessibility. Yes, everyone from every class and race faces the same challenges in regards to ACEs but as Covid showed us, not everyone had access to care, and those in poor neighborhoods, living in poverty and crammed housing, suffered most. It took great length to just get vaccines to Africa; the data clearly showing that while all humans are created equal, not all have equal access. Therefore I find that the Dr.'s rebuke of the speaker at the conference was unwarranted and I thought, tone deaf, and unnecessary. Understanding a community's history and thus need, I think, is critical in this regard. Yes, to truly address trauma for instance in African Americans, one cannot ignore or brush aside slavery, racism and its effects passed down from one generation to another. To simply look at the sufferings of a poor kid in Downtown Baltimore with no access as the same with multi-millionaires in Silicone Valley defeats the purpose.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Great listening

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-23-22

Loved it! Although I thought the first chapters focused too much on Austrian history.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup