Nathan

excellent book

Revisado: 12-26-20

an amazing creative writer. character dev. superb. plot very enterwoven and catching. a wonderful book

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

one of the absolute beat books ever read

Revisado: 10-11-20

This has to be one of the absolute best fiction books i ever read. I love the philosophy - metaphys and ethics - Orson intertwines in the storyline. Such a phenomenal book!

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

This book truly sucks! Very boring and superficial

Revisado: 07-19-20

Such a bad book. Very boring! Poor storyline. I got so bored with the plotline. Bad character development. Plot was rather drab and just plain boring. Plus the theme really was superficial not deep or thougt provoking! I will never read an Margaret Atwood book again!

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Terribble book. Will never read this author again!

Revisado: 07-02-20

A really bad book. I will never ever read this author again. Plot really sucked! Had some thoughtful philosophical ontology overtones, but very poorly rendered because of boring plot. Very boring!

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

very bad book. all conjecture, full of assumptions

Revisado: 04-18-20

very bad quality research, because will not track evidence unless fits into their presuppositions. This is presuppositional research, not evidentialist. One needa to go where evidence leads, not be hogtied by presuppositions. it is really annoying to see such smart people become slaves to their presuppositions; they cannot even consider options and lines of evidence outside their preconceived notions. got to have open mind to wherever evidence leads and consider all options no matter your presups. Science is stifled by this presuppositionalist mindset. To me this author and others lkle him are are just religious zealots, who worship at the altar of materialism. Religion is always based on unquestionably presuppositions, amd this author's unquestionable presupposition is materialism. this is called methodological materialism. Methodological materialism will hinder humanities advancement. Science needs to be evidence based, without these dogged presuppositions.

it is a breath of fresh air when i actually read a book without religious presuppositions, but this book was so full of materialist presuppositions, it almoat smothered me!

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 5 personas

awesome book

Revisado: 02-19-20

awesome book. I would highly reccomend. Very thought provoking. not full of materialism pressupossitions. is evidentially based.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

good science until the end

Revisado: 01-20-20

the book presented good evidence based argument until the very end when the presuppositional position of the author came comes out. The author argues the veracity of NDE content based on Biblical coherence. If not coherent with Bible, then a a description from the devil. Though this is a good presuppositional argument, it does. it meet the evidential standards I look for.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

decent book.

Revisado: 01-12-20

makes some good sound arguments. but has a materialistic presupposition. I prefer evidentialism rather than presuppositoonalism, albeit materialist or supernaturalist presuppositionalism. Materialist thinkers usually claim to be evidentialist, but they always start from the materialist presuppositions and build their arguments from there - hence presuppositionalist not evidentialist. the book was too presuppositional for me. needs to be more evidential.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

an awesome enlightening book.

Revisado: 01-11-20

I do not usually read/listen to books more than once, but this will be a book I will reread to soak up more insight.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

very thoughtful but not so convincing

Revisado: 01-07-20

a thoughtful outlook. but still.lacks evidence enough for sound argumentation. I would like to here more convincing evidence that Christianity had the corner on truth.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña