Jacques Boulet

robotic

Revisado: 09-21-22

robotic narration limits learnability
listening is not enjoyable
extra words fifteen? not much else to say

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

half brained

Revisado: 08-22-22

A disappointing biased presentation based on antiquated blank slate logic combined with uncertain and I researched half brain assumptions. just how do you consciously unplug logic? The greatest fault is the minimized presumption that unchanging "principle" founds all justification as if principle is a constant, and all minds and cultures are, or should be inherently the same. The start of the book argues that so many self help books miss the mark, yet this one for the same reasons espouses the same metaphysical manifestations it proposes to defeat while surreptitiously selling minimized religious ethics while edifying counterintuitive economic success. Serve one God...? Discompassionate and annoying 😨🙄

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

no thought to listener

Revisado: 01-12-15

robotic narration, constant cadence, fill in the blanks not much else to say here, disappointing

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The narration of this book is too fast

Revisado: 01-12-15

Fortunately there is a half speed button, because following or notating this text is nearly impossible at regular speed. Slower

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Don't expect a truly scientific logic here

Revisado: 03-12-14

What disappointed you about Religion and Science?

Largely presumptuous, scantily researched, preferential logic. This "old" reference is based on a jaded perspective that intends to use science as a means to discredit religion yet it does not apply the same logic it uses to justify science in matters of discussion on religion. This very jaded discussion on many topics generalizes and fails to approach fully the sciences it addresses and 'guesses" presumptuously without applying the same inferences used to edify science therefore the logic is neither entertaining nor enlightening and because it lacks logical consistency serves no educational purposes other than to describe the authors personal preferences. i.e. Where it discusses determinism as a faulty yet acceptable means to approach science it does not apply the same in sociological discussion as to why religion has become a majorative state of understanding in most cultures. IF in fact it were a truly scientific reference, it would treat the question equally and divest into the sociology and psychology of religion whereas it prefers to create a psychological wasteland based on personal doctrine rather than invested interest in the sociological interests that prefer religion in moderate and moral social structures.

Would you be willing to try another one of David Case’s performances?

NO

Any additional comments?

The narrator is hard to understand and seems largely disinterested in the material, often sighing, failing to yawn, but nearly at times, it makes the read very tedious and uninteresting. The performance did not appreciate the value of the context of the author.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

The best gift

Revisado: 08-17-06

Very Simply, the DalaiLama's gift of loving to all and everyone! Get it and live it...

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona