OYENTE

M. Johnson

  • 6
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 37
  • calificaciones

Do you want the story of the Caucasus or Charles King’s Pithy commentary?

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-14-25

If you want to hear Charles King’s editorialization of what happened in the Caucasus, then this is the book for you. If you want to learn the story of what happened in the Caucasus, you’re going to be disappointed.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Interpretation of events was off

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-27-25

My main issue was that he really interpreted events through an Azeri lens, putting a lot of the onus for the conflict on the Armenians. It was a fairly gross misinterpretation of the history of the conflict.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Meh Performance, but GREAT book, especially now.

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-17-24

The performance was a bit wooden, but the book was amazing. Especially now. So I need to add more words, so here I am continuing to type.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Poor vocal performance

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-07-24

The book is good, providing a lot of details that newsreaders might have missed out on. But the vocal performance trying to do vocal inflections for the female members of this story was poorly done and distracting.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

This book is mistitled

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-22-24

The performance was awful containing many mispronunciations of common Armenian names. And the title of the book should have been “A military analysis OF THE WEAPONS USED in the Second Nagorno Karabakh war. As the book shows little interest in the history of the war itself.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Informative, but slightly difficult listen

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-24-19

The book reads like Reporters notes at times, and sometimes it was hard to keep track of all the threads...but all of the threads are important.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup