OYENTE

Natalie

  • 3
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 4
  • calificaciones

So cringey and naive

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-23-25

Started out okay with an interesting concept but the protagonist is my b**** eating crackers (BEC).

Apparently, everyone, including Carl, is obsessed with her and the entire world revolves around her, yet she’s just a “normal” girl. As you may imagine, this isn’t a compelling narrative for a book, especially when the protagonist is a narcissist. She touts some self awareness, but this is done in such a cheesy fashion it’s hard to take seriously. This especially comes to a head in the climax of the book.

Honestly, I’m with the defenders. Why would we trust the Carls? Especially who they’ve chosen. And all the dream stuff. Ugh. So dumb. So CHEESY.

I don’t even care about the cliffhanger ending.

The voice actor did a great job. Unfortunately, the story and characters were lacking

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Trying to bring back psychoanalysis? Why?!

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-08-25

In the first half of the book, the author mentions 3 BPD patients who “fell in love with him”. The author seems to have weak boundaries with his patients and seems to enjoy the extra attention he gets from his BPD patients (why on earth do you need to meet with a patient 4 times a week?). He even admits to being jealous that he’s not the most important man in Ana’s life anymore once she finds a healthy relationship. Why are some men like this?!

I have LOTS of thoughts. However, what prompted this was that the author says that based on the DSM 5, abused children cannot be diagnosed with PTSD because it doesn’t explicitly mention child abuse. As someone who works in this field, this is NOT true. Just because the DSM doesn’t mention child abuse explicitly, clinicians know that these things are traumatizing and will diagnose a child with PTSD or adjustment disorder if they show the symptoms.

As a clinical psychologist, he probably only has trained with adults and doesn’t know this. But it’s so easy to ask a colleague. Or read a research paper about childhood ptsd. Like I can’t. I agree the DSM generally needs major improvements and many disorders share marked similarities and overlap (ie transdiagnostic traits). I also understand this author is on the fringes of psychology. I appreciate the neurodiversity approach, but he made not mention of other diagnoses that look a lot like BPD, like autism or ADHD, other than trauma.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Interesting stories but soaked in authors bias with little self awareness

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-26-24

The stories are great, but the end up each chapter, the author goes on a rant about how medication would have ruined this person and that as a society we are over-using medications for mental illness.

Maybe in some cases medications would have stifled their creativity but a lot of these historical figures lived these dark inner lives. I’ve been there myself before and I’m so happy to be born when anti-depressants and other psychiatric medications exist (read Prozac Nation for life before that). Marilyn and Diana could have lived much longer if they had modern medical treatments.

This book stigmatizes those who turn to medications for help and promotes the idea that certain people should suffer so they can make the world better for other people.

I’ve started fast forwarding through the last few paragraphs of each chapter because it’s repetitive too.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup