OYENTE

Nobody Special

  • 4
  • opiniones
  • 2
  • votos útiles
  • 11
  • calificaciones

Some new ideas with some cut and paste

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-26-23

Not quite the “Rosemary’s Baby” knockoff that it’s made out to be but borrows more from Susperia than anything else.

Pretty engaging plot but tiresome gaslighting procedural that becomes predictable until the end. Could have take more risks than “someone is trying to hurt me and everyone is in on it…OR ARE THEY?”

The AHS show already combined and condensed characters but right up Ryan Murphy’s alley with desperate actors, snowy beaches and his penchant for gaslight stories.

I listened to bug my partner about what’s different while the show airs.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

The narrator matters, the story is abstract.

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-20-22

After listening to The Dante Club and it’s wonderful narration I was thoroughly disappointed by the narration of The Dante Chamber. I understand the change of location may have required a more British-leaning cadence but I sorely missed the performances of repeat characters from the previous book.

The story is just ok. The “twist” comes late and in an exposition dump of about 10 minutes that seemed so rushed and wasted when it could have been more tightly woven in the first part of the book. I did thoroughly enjoy the imagery of opioid and laudanum induced painters and scholars in England but the reliance of Dante puns became a bit eye-rolling. There’s a reason “Inferno” is the most widely read of the divine comedy and The Dante Chamber doesn’t always hold up to the Dante Club much like inferno and Purgatorio.

I would reluctantly recommend, if not for the unconventional twist.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Imagery lacking cohesive narrative

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-08-22

Two, no three stories, really. None complete or fleshed out. A rambling second person dialogue that lapses into old English, jumps from story to story to story and ultimately doesn’t complete any full narrative. The author enjoys his own work, though which makes the narration stand out.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Not LGBTQ friendly

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-22-21

Blatant, outdated and unnecessary use of “Gay Panic” as a motive for a murder that adds nothing to plot. Oh so edgy main characters. Skip it. Also, SAME themes in Chalk Man. Author clearly has issues with lgbtq people and portrays them as predatory. Boomer trash.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup