OYENTE

Peter Bernard Hooper

  • 2
  • opiniones
  • 3
  • votos útiles
  • 4
  • calificaciones

As a Catholic myself the book has real force.

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-25-20

The writing style of the book is a mix of academic work, methodic and involved, and yet it steps back from being only thing by a large amount of story telling and reports of a large number of interviews If one was asked is this book primarily a psychological reflection or a sociological one, then sociology gets the tick in its box. A number of times Martel is able to point to how the story of the individual is linked to the problem and issue a whole society experiences and is required to face as a result of the telling of that individual's story. Finally there is one idea Martel offers which is noteworthy. He points to the presence of both gay people and non-gays in the Vatican but does not then argue there are two lobbies, one gay and the other straight. He observes while there are gay individuals, group formation for them, the capacity to be a political block is not there because that sexual orientation or interest can't be socially acknowledged. There is the ability for a political movement that attacks gays to be formed, and it is there in the Vatican, and it is populated by many who are homophile. There is permission for this group formation and Martel gives time to explain how this faction operates. This book is socking for some, as a Catholic the news that some in the Vatican are gay is no surprise, however the goings on, the things said and done, that can be indeed unsettling. A book which can be recommended to those who are willing to be open to what it offers.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

Perhaps being an older person helps value this boo

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-15-20

Since approaching one's retirement gives one the profile of being older rather than younger, then this is how I position myself. I have seen myself as being on the liberal/left most of my life and there is this drift to the centre in how I respond and think. For this reason I argue Jonathan Haidt's book is useful, it provides a guide. The language used, the structure of the text, the way it moves from beginning to end is one of accessibility, it is not difficult to read or a struggle to unpack. Haidt clearly has an academic background but it does not block a reader from grasping what the text offers. As things stand in 2020 there are examples of polarised communities when it comes to ideas and social practice. The sexual identity worlds seem to be at war, and for some science has become, again, a provider of knowledge that unsettles and threatens. Talk to a transsexual person that biology is sex and you will be positioned as a transphobe; tell a homosexual or gay man that the sexual identity arguments that used notions of sexual orientation that were so helpful in giving him and others access to legal changes and increased personal and group freedoms, and the term sexual orientation can be applied to the paedophile and again you may be shown the door. The value of Jonathan Haidt's book is he clearly values science, particularity what biological sciences offer, and links this to moral argument and human psychology. This book makes for a good read.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup