OYENTE

kavita

  • 28
  • opiniones
  • 3
  • votos útiles
  • 70
  • calificaciones

We have learned nothing

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-13-25

As someone who served in the 2000s, this book is extremely upsetting. In more than 20 years of conflict in the Middle East before I enlisted, we learned nothing. And we continued to make the same mistakes for another 20 years.

Never has the adage, “if we don’t learn from history, we will be doomed to repeat it,” been more appropriate.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Very boring take on a classic

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-17-24

It just didn’t have anything to add. The characters are bland. They have no depth or drive. They just kinda move the story forward. Much less scary than Lovecraft’s original work. I honestly don’t understand what the point was since it wasn’t scary nor was it character driven.

If you want a masterful retelling of Lovecraft’s work, read Providence by Allen Moore.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Pointless remake of a classic

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-08-24

I was excited to hear a retelling of one of my favorite Poe stories. I had the expectation that we would dive deeper into the characters, maybe expand on the horror over a longer time. Maybe the author would develop the relationships between the character so the fall of the Ushers would have a real emotional impact.

I honestly don’t understand what the author hoped to accomplish in this story other than make the protagonist a transgender person. Does this add to the story in any way? Does this bring a new interesting pov to add depth to the story? No. Is representation important? Absolutely. It was just a lot of bandwidth and time to force it into this story which certainly took away from the actual plot. Easton spends lots of time complaining about how the world sees her; which would be understandable if she wasn’t visiting her dying friend. She spends significantly more time fretting about her pronouns instead of the people literally suffering horrific maladies right in front of her.

Furthermore, you never get a sense of the bond between the Ushers and Easton. She says she’s been friends with them her whole life but it doesn’t come through in their actions. Easton doesn’t seem to have any real connection to Madalyn other stating she has a connection to Madalyn. So when the horrors unfold upon Madalyn, there is no heartbreak or devastation relayed through Easton’s thoughts or actions. Somehow, this story is longer than the source material yet less happens in a less impactful way.

And I feel Kingfisher completely lost the spirit of Poe’s original story. His story was supernatural. The Ushers were cursed. As much as I love the idea of sentient fungus reanimating the dead, it does not fit into the tone of the original work. This became a Lovecraftian story as soon as it turned more to scientific horror. I love both authors but they are distinctly different in their approach to horror. If you’re retelling a Poe story, I shouldn’t be thinking of Lovecraft the whole time.

Not the worst book I’ve ever read, but I will certainly be getting a refund.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Great spy thriller

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-31-24

Spoilers: Love these books. But I do find Katy to be a weak point. The absolute most savage part of the first book was Reece’s willingness to sacrifice her to avenge his family. Then they just kinda fall in love. She isn’t nearly as traumatized as she should be. I’d have been ok with them getting together eventually but it should have been a journey. It seems more like Carr’s fantasy about his real life reporter friend.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Great hard science fiction

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-14-24

Inventive, thoughtful, original take on the over done alien invasion story. I just hope it doesn’t end with a “Destroy the alien base/mothership/leader and the drones stop” ending that every alien invasion story goes with.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Still relevant

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-23-24

Just an amazing adaptation. And a relevant warning of our times. Even more so today than when it was written. Beautiful performances by all of the cast. Can’t wait to re-listen.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Worst book I’ve ever been able to finish (Spoilers)

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-16-24

Fans of Always Sunny in Philadelphia may recall the gang coming up with a movie where Dolph Lundgren call smell crime and shows full penetration sex scenes. If you love the first part but could do with the latter, this book is for you. Seriously.

Also the authors throws out Noir sounding lines that don’t really make sense in context to the action. Silly concepts, poor character development, motivations that don’t add up. I felt as though the plot was a square peg being forced through a round hole.

The villain carries a projector and MRI machine on her person so she can expose her master plan to the hero. And in case that wasn’t clear enough, she gives him her journal to answer every last question.

The main character is constantly going on tangents and expositions to explain the world he lives in. There is no trust that the reader is smart enough to pay attention and figure things out. This is the shining example of telling rather than showing.

As a fan of noir and cyberpunk, I get the sense the author has spent enough to mimic the sound of the genre but never understood it.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Weird, tragic, disturbing, heartfelt

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-29-23

This is a character driven story. Something most books I read fail to accomplish. These character feel like they’re children. All the characters, even the disgusting ones, have motive, morals, sympathy, ect. The plot is good but it’s the characters that make it great.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Boring

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-12-23

This author has no idea how to create a believable character. No depth at all. Nothing is truly risked and the story was flat. Read a Jack Carr book instead.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Just lame

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-25-23

I love action and adventure. But this feels like it’s written by someone who knows nothing about fighting or combat in any way. I lost count of how many people Jack knocked out and I only read a third of the book. Just because he’s a vet doesn’t make him a badass. Poorly written. Just feels like how ppl who have never been in a fight imagine winning fights.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup