OYENTE

Jun Suh Lee

  • 2
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 3
  • calificaciones

Few real “professional” in poker

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-21-24

A good American story. You can now (at least) understand why he’s always unset when opponents beat him with “gambling” hands. His idea of “good player” is somewhat similar to Howard Marks (investor). He doesn’t count lucky win or unlucky lose but cares more about how well each individual played (though it always looks like a total loser & makes us laugh when he is blown up about that after losing all of his chips).

His record of being the holder of most bracelets & in-money kinda proves, knowing his idea of “good player,” why he kept saying he is the best poker player in the world. It’s like Warren Buffett kept saying he is the best investor in the world (he doesn’t do that).

It’s impressive that he emphasizes a lot on family, even though I can see it wasn’t a smooth journey considering his “ego issue.” Regardless, It’s a smart decision of him to put importance in family when his job is a structurally unstable one.

It’s a good American story and I admire the country which even this kind of person can rise as long as they find their strengths (I’m not an American).

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Good read

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-21-24

When reading about biographies of business people. There are two kinds of life.

1) It is very exciting. Making smart decisions every single weeks, fights, changing world, huge ups and downs, running out of time, betrayal and come back, strong emotions.

2) This “sounds” boring. In fact, a huge part of their book is usually about family, favorite hobbies, religion (Jesus kind of thing), little fun episode that’s nothing to do with business.

I like reading both (though the first is more “fun” to read). But every time I read about 2) type, I always found more evidences the 2) is smarter, at least in terms of living life.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña