OYENTE

John

  • 5
  • opiniones
  • 1
  • voto útil
  • 20
  • calificaciones

The usual cliches

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-08-24

Nothing too exciting, usual cliches at the end. Not even close to Lincoln Lawyer. The narrator is nice though.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Чудові якісні казки

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-19-24

Професійна начитка акторів, влучно підібрана музика та спецефекти. Літературна українська мова. Одні з найкращих аудіоказок українською.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A story stretched out into a book

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-11-24

personal life story intermingled with news reports and a bit of "spy" biography. Not worth the time

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

written by a typical californian

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-27-24

"A Law Says What?" penned by a typical Californian social justice warrior presents a one-sided and overly idealistic view of the legal system, lacking nuance and depth. While the author's passion for social justice is evident, the book often oversimplifies complex legal issues and fails to acknowledge the practical limitations of implementing sweeping reforms.

Throughout the text, the author's biases are palpable, detracting from the credibility of their arguments. Instead of engaging in constructive dialogue, the book frequently resorts to divisive rhetoric, alienating readers who may hold differing viewpoints. Furthermore, the author's emphasis on personal anecdotes and emotional appeals detracts from the book's scholarly rigor, undermining its potential impact as a persuasive piece of advocacy.

While the book raises important questions about the role of law in addressing societal inequalities, its solutions often lack feasibility and fail to account for the diverse perspectives and interests at play. By presenting an overly simplistic narrative of good versus evil, the author overlooks the complexities inherent in legal decision-making and the need for compromise in achieving meaningful change.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Waste of time for a primary care provider

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-25-23

The book sounds like a gathering of online facts from Google, not a crash course by any means.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup