Robert

Too much fluff

Revisado: 03-04-24

We he said in 17 hours could have been said in 2 hours. I wish he would have just gotten to the point.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

published in 1999

Revisado: 10-30-19

I was surprised to find that this book was published in 1999. one would not know by looking at the information on Audible. I assume not much has changed, but such information would definitely impact my decision to purchase the book. Assuming that the information is still accurate, the book is excellent.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Good info but also unnecessary left wing political

Revisado: 09-12-19

This book contains good information and is overall well-written. However, the repeated comments on "white privilege" were gratuitous, annoying, and added nothing to the reader's understanding of anything but the author's political views. Such commentary cannot help but make one wonder if a more neutral person would have had a different analysis on some things. The book would have been much better had the author just stuck to the subject matter and used plain descriptions when discrepancies were a substantive part of the analysis. However, the basic facts seem to be well-documented and informative.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

Liberal philosophy, not science or history.

Revisado: 05-21-19

This book is 5% historical facts and 95% liberal philosophy. I was hoping to learn something about the historical development of humans, but this book is all liberal philosophy on how wrong we are for being wbo we are. There is vertually no science about how we got to where we are. Very disappointing.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 3 personas