OYENTE

Bailey Brown

  • 4
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 27
  • calificaciones

Just okay

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-18-23

For the story: I didn’t love it, didn’t hate it. It was a good idea, but I think it was lacking some things. It didn’t make me feel anything. I would have liked to have more information on the Delegation to contextualize people’s hatred of it more; there is obviously the constant surveillance, and some murders, but it didn’t feel like enough. There were several moments that were too convenient, sort of “deus ex machina” type stuff. Even aside from that though, something about the writing was just not quite there for me.
As far as the narrator, I don’t think she was a good choice for this one. She didn’t really “fit the role,” you know? Not edgy enough, I guess.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

New favorite

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-29-21

I so thoroughly enjoyed this in every way, it is now up there in my top favorites. Loved the story, and Ray Porter’s narration was amazing; he really brought it to life.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Pretty good

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-15-21

I’d say 3.5 stars. It was an interesting enough story, but a little anti-climactic. I don’t regret it. And the narrator was good.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Story was okay; narration was bad

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-01-21

First, the narrator:
This audiobook was exactly the reason I was hesitant about getting into audiobooks. The narrator’s, er...interpretation was robotic at best, and cartoonish at worst. My initial impression was that it sounded like it was being narrated by a speech to text program. Then she got to the secondary characters...the men all had a vaguely “adult Bart Simpson” sound, or like a woman actively mocking a man rather than just trying to sound masculine.
And the female characters weren’t much better. They’re the type of voices you imagine someone using when reading a silly story to a child, not a serious book for adults. And, all the foreign characters had the same, bad, exaggerated, vaguely Eastern European accent. (Even the Mexicans.)

The main character’s voice was fine, but devoid of emotion; and I would venture to say that even serious people who don’t smile a lot still speak with somewhat varied intonation. I recall only two or three times she spoke with any kind of variation in tone at all, even though she was described, at times, as laughing and giggling, so she obviously wasn’t a robot. Regardless, I got used to that; the male characters I could not get used to, and cringed every time their lines came up...which is often, in a book about chess.

Now, the story:
It was pretty interesting, and I might have enjoyed it more if I had read it rather than listened to it, but there were aspects I didn’t care for. There are some gratuitously vulgar parts toward the beginning, to the tune of an older child sexually molesting a younger one. I suppose he was trying to set the scene for the type of environment she was growing up in, but it seemed unnecessarily detailed, and not really crucial to the story...And then the offending character is usually described in a favorable light. I don’t know, seemed rather poor taste to me.
In any case it’s only a small part at the beginning.
I found the story overall interesting enough to keep listening, but I think I would have been very bored if I had no interest in, or knowledge of, Chess, considering the long amount of time he spends describing the games in detail.
The main character isn’t overly likable a lot of the time, but I don’t think a main character necessarily has to be...real people aren’t always likable, even if they are otherwise interesting.
Anyway, I’d recommend reading this one yourself. Or, if you don’t want to read lots of chess game descriptions, maybe just watch the show. (Although I haven’t seen that yet to know if it’s better.) Edit: Have now seen the show. It is better.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup