danlen

Johnson is a fraud

Revisado: 08-17-24

This is just another attempt by Johnson to denigrate the Christian faith. His reasoning is so illogical it’s impossible to listen beyond the first few chapters. He starts off by saying all of the original sources are unreliable, and then goes on to say over and over again that the sources Are incorrect. It is just a time after time ridiculing of a set of gospels that were never meant to be analyzed in this cryptic format. Johnson is a Christian Vader, one could also say he’s a Christian hater. She makes value judgments, subjective interpretations of the motives of Individuals in the Christian Canning. He criticizes the four main text for not being well put together. I find it unbelievably ironic at 2000 years later, with all the tools at Johnson’s disposal his text is when I would say is equally disjointed and un unreadable I wish I had never purchased thisaudiobook this one is equally as bad as his first I thought I would give his writing one more chance because of his pedigree, but apparently he was just passed along like so many college professors are.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

His total disdain for Christianity

Revisado: 02-15-24

Each of the other “Great Religions” courses were instructed by practitioners of those faiths. Christianity was taught by a man who appears to be a stand-up comedian. He ridiculed and demeaned the faith at every opportunity. So immensely disappointed.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Argument against not an explanation of.....

Revisado: 02-26-20

Dale is clever. He starts the book claiming to be curious and quickly descends into a lecture on the faults within many versions of christianity in dealing with the trinity. He takes an almost scientific and semantical look at the trinity and deems it wanting. What he fails to recognizes is that the trinity, like God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit is an exercise in faith. Faith is what make the trinity real and none of his arguments will change that. Don't buy if you are looking for a faith based understanding.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 3 personas

Dr. Childers inexorably use the term inexorable

Revisado: 07-15-17

What did you like best about A History of Hitler's Empire, 2nd Edition? What did you like least?

emmmmmm, AND, inexorable, three speech uses that almost ruin the course. Also, he repeats himself over and over. 7/12 of the course is the lead up to Hitler taking power. Could have been far shorter. Far too important a topic to botch this badly.

Would you be willing to try another one of Professor Thomas Childers’s performances?

no

Was A History of Hitler's Empire, 2nd Edition worth the listening time?

not really

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Reader ruins the story

Revisado: 03-04-16

What did you like best about The Kennedy Detail? What did you like least?

It was an interesting account of how the Secret Service viewed their role. I have a hard time reading a story in which the author believes that the SS never made a mistake. In his opinion they did everything right, yet the President still died.

What didn’t you like about Alan Sklar’s performance?

The most annoying part of listening to the tape was that the reader continuously mis-pronounce JFK's daughters name. How in Gods name did that get through the editing process. Low quality.

If this book were a movie would you go see it?

No

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Sounded like he was reading instead of lecturing

Revisado: 12-18-15

Is there anything you would change about this book?

Childers is really good, however, I am not crazy about his presentation style in this lecture.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Not much of a story

Revisado: 01-12-15

Too much rehash of previous books. Reader confused ranks many times. Lowell's story is redundant.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña