OYENTE

Marc

  • 18
  • opiniones
  • 27
  • votos útiles
  • 220
  • calificaciones

Clear headed analysis

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-23-24

This was a detailed and cogent analysis of the most difficult conflict in human history. While the author has clearly been telling this story for many years, he lays out fact after fact without invective and only a little hyperbole.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Hilarious and accurate portrayal of the C suite

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-30-23

This was a phenomenal read. The book tells the true secrets of executive politics while pretending to be a comedy (a very good one nonetheless).

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Mind numbingly dull

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-25-22

This could have been enjoyable with a better narrator. I was surprised at the end to find it was a modern story, because the character is so typically mid 20th century - obnoxious and emotionally unintelligent

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Unbelievably boring

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-15-21

This story about a drone, well, drones on and on. And the reader seems determined to add to this by keeping a monotone emotionless voice

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Takes a sharp turn into far left field conspiracy theory

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-22-20

A perfectly enjoyable science fiction tale about lost prehistoric undersea creatures suddenly turns into wackjob nonsense about CIA black ops conspiracies to keep oil barons rich by manipulating aliens

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Narrator cures insomnia!

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-24-19

This story might be interesting. Every once in a while there is an intriguing moment, but then the narrator’s drone fades to the background. Even when I try to pat attention to his words they eventually become virtually incomprehensible because I can’t bear his endless droning

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

So much hype and left me disappointed

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-22-19

Storyline told mostly as a narrative and then randomly as flash-forwards and flashbacks left me confused and annoyed. While the plot makes clear the terror and strangeness of living in communist China, the characters are poorly developed and then have random deep-dives into historic episodes, simply so that the author could make a point about politics. The science meanwhile is poorly conceived and the titular three-body problem ultimately isn't correctly presented or resolved (even besides the fact that there are four bodies involved)

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

This isn't even funny

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-11-19

I tried. I really tried. I listened to half the book, hoping he would finally say something funny. But all he does is whine. I stopped listening when he began literally listing and reviewing marijuana cultivars - no joke!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

Hit and miss

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-21-19

This should have been a fascinating story. The author is extremely creative and generates a broad and coherent alternative reality. The protagonists are far too shallow however, and their only individuality is derived from endless juvenile humor. Since the antagonists are equally vapid, it too quickly becomes clear that the whole plot is just a fiction within a fiction.

The narrator is ok but can't do character voices. The audio itself is problematic. There are long gaps, and some strange transitions leading me to think that some audio was chopped out accidentally.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The plot makes its own excuse for bad writing

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-08-18

What good can I say about a book with a poorly conceived plot, which then explains away its own failure by blaming it on itself as a ghost writer

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup