OYENTE

Jack S

  • 5
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 14
  • calificaciones

Fairly slow and mundane.

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-23-25

The story is about a former Army medic/EMT becoming a butler for a wizard. There is not much wizardry, and it’s very low key at best. It’s mostly about the Butler becoming a butler and developing loyalty for an old man who is exceedingly rich. It’s slow moving, discussing everyday activities. The antagonist is not very mean and starts out sympathetic. While the protagonist only has to fight and win a court hearing for the book to conclude. It’s a bit of a window into how the rich live, but I certainly expected more in the way of action or actual drama. It’s basically a plot for a soap opera.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Less impressive than his other books

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-20-24

I’m primarily a fan of Scalzi’s hard sci-fi style. Intergalactic wars are my thing. This book had a distinctively different feel. If I can be crude, it attempted to be touchy-feely, especially with the women characters. Unfortunately it came across as a bit cringeworthy. It’s clearly in Scalzi’s wheelhouse, just not as good as his others. And it’s a bit contrived when the colonists just show up at a new planet that’s not the one they were going to and had studied. There were several little plot turns like that that came across as unrealistic. Even with two bad guys in the sky…

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Tedious/Repetitive

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-18-22

Although this was a very detailed review of the battle of Midway with significant insight and surprising assertions backed up by new evidence, it was simply tiresome and repetitive. Points were made over and over and the prose was tedious. Unfortunately the author’s use of the word “moreover” became the focus of the listener, cringing each time it was used as the book wore on. It was as if the author had a word-of-the-day calendar and it was stuck on “moreover”, never a “further”, “also” or “in addition” in sight…

Good, detailed history of the battle, and the war in the Pacific…if you can make your way through it.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Another Lee apologist

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-16-22

The book relayed some new facts about the detail level of Pickett’s charge. But it searches for a cause of the loss and a cause for the South’s loss of the war. It rightfully analyzes the battle as the last opportunity for the South to win. But what goes largely unstated is the North’s influence on the battle. It doesn’t account for the Northern cavalry repelling Stuart and for the remaining Northern force’s disposition had there been a breakthrough at the angle. It blames everyone, including God, for the battle’s loss, except for Lee. What is unsaid is that all the actions of an army are the complete and full responsibility of its commander. Excuses aside, Lee was wholly responsible for the loss. But southern sympathizers just will not accept the fact.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Very interesting history

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-27-21

The book traces alcoholic spirits from biblical times to present in a 10 part lecture. It is an interesting topic but it takes about 5 lectures to even get to bourbon. It often assumes the listener has knowledge of the whiskey industry without foundation. And it tends to lump all whiskeys into bourbon. I think Scotch and Rye whiskeys are whiskey, not bourbon. But limiting the discussion to just bourbon would have made the lectures much shorter and less interesting. Good easy listen!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup