OYENTE

Sir Shops-a-Lot

  • 4
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 5
  • calificaciones

Inspiring

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-23-24

If you want to be inspired, read this book. It is biblically sound and personally crafted to bring out the greatness in us. Bravo.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Biblically Accurate

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-20-24

Great reading of both scripture and science. Ross really calls out theologians like Walton and Lane Craig for essential chickening-out at critical points and giving in to views posited by unbelieving scientists. The theory that Adam and Eve were not the only two original humans, as scripture tells us, is one of these major pitfalls that both Walton and Craig seem open to. Bravo Hugh Ross, Bravo.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Near perfect work though questions remain.

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-04-24

Craig is truly gifted by God. His conclusions of God as timeless before creation and temporal after creation make certain sense. A few questions remain though. As mentioned at the start, time is extraordinarily difficult to define. And unless I am mistaken, Craig does not actually tell us how he is defining time. Even if I missed it, if time were solely defined as movement, or the presence thereof, then time could exist before creation. God the Father's constant emanation of the Son for example is eternal movement. Also, if one defines time as the presence of change, then God's continual thoughts in eternity constitute this change - not in His essence or personhood but as a form of internal state, such that one moment He thinks one thought and another moment He thinks a different thought. Even Craig refers to this last point, though he doesn't tell us why this fails to affect his conclusions. Nevertheless, this is a masterful work.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

I wish he was my science teacher!

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-21-23

It was so complex and detailed, as it should be, but so honest about how the planet could not possibly have formed on its own by chance. Life needs so many precursors and parameters that chance just cannot explain it. I really wish I had a science teacher like this in high school - someone who could explain the processes of cosmic and planetary formation with complete honesty.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup