withpatience

annoying

Revisado: 10-26-17

poorly written, boring narration . this guy is full of himself. the journey was not really a part of this book, it was really disappointing.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

good idea, poorly written. no real plot.

Revisado: 02-15-17

I like the idea, but it has been done before, with a better plot. I was hoping for a stellar ending... didn't happen it was super disappointing.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

This book was poorly thought out.

Revisado: 11-08-16

I am an atheist. This book did not add anything to the conversation. I found the examples to be shallow.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

so so

Revisado: 10-28-16

this is one book where Dean Koontz shows his distaste for people who don't share his religion.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

not<br /> his best

Revisado: 06-24-16

it just didn't have the grab that his older pre Trixie books did.... it was mild.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

good book

Revisado: 04-22-16

good narrator, better story. I've never been a huge King fan, bit this one keeps me coming back.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

don't get it

Revisado: 03-28-16

Not only was this not a surprising sexual fantasy, it was poorly written. The narrator was horrible.
my inner goddess decided to hang herself instead of being subjected to this unoriginal, prude, chicken scratch being called a book.


I already figure it would be silly, but I didn't expect it to be so poorly written. I'm shocked that it made it past the editors desk in this condition.

the narrator was not effective at letting you know what Anna was thinking vs saying out loud. that is a big deal in first person.
I have returned the book.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

good book rushed ending

Revisado: 09-04-15

the narrator did a great job, this is one of Dean Koontz mid level books, good story but the conclusion is a bit rushed.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

the narration was good as always, the story was no

Revisado: 01-14-15

What would have made Saint Odd better?

The story has no meaning, the ending was devoid of depth. To end this series with such little imagination was not a smart choice.
If Dean had written this book 10 years ago I would have been able to stand it.

Has Saint Odd turned you off from other books in this genre?

This book has ensured that as an avid Koontz reader I will not waste my time, nor money on any future writing of his.
He has run out of ideas, and the ability to see them through.
No longer convincing, no longer able to produce a re readable book.
It feels like he is writing bored now. Odd deserved more than this.

Have you listened to any of David Aaron Baker’s other performances before? How does this one compare?

The narrator was great, love his voice and pace.

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from Saint Odd?

The last four chapters. But they would have had to be re written.

Any additional comments?

When you spend two books trying to create an enigma, don't just sweep them away with silly endings, don't leave so many unaddressed story lines.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 29 personas