OYENTE

David Frank

  • 3
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 4
  • calificaciones

Maigret a New York -- be careful -- abridged

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
1 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-20-23

This audiobook was abridged. I'm not sure why you'd choose to abridge a book that runs slightly more than 100 pages. Moreover, the gratuitous use of unflattering (French) accents when New Yorkers speak is annoying. Simenon actually lived in the US for a time. Certainly Americans have an accent, but this is too much. Not a fan, and I'm not sure Simenon would be, either.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Classic Maigret

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-20-23

Le Chien Jaune is an early Simenon/Maigret - the larger than life Maigret, the emphatic Maigret. It is a mystery of betrayal and revenge in a provincial town where an unscrupulous clique of high-heeled boys rules, but whose mutual luck is just starting to unravel. Le Chien Jaune -- the yellow dog -- a large, fearless breed -- seems to appear after criminal attacks, and becomes an omen for the ignorant.
Simenon is a superb writer. His prose is spare and taut. The ending - Maigret gathering all the parties in the courtyard of a citadel for cross examination - is classic - please note that this novel predates Christie's, Murder on the Orient Express, by three years. The narrator has wonderful pronunciation. It is unabridged.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

The meritocracy

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-28-20

This is a fine book. Prof. Reich points out in more detail than I could how the plutocracy - he calls it the oligarchy - have given the “playing field” a nice tilt, to benefit the well born. The drawback is that Mr. Reich doesn’t cover how the system we have - the system that made him an important person - tends to lead to precisely what he deplores.

Reich favors a meritocracy - one that hasn’t been co-opted by the plutocracy - rigged - something he also points out in great detail. If only the oligarchy could be stopped from rigging the meritocracy!. The problem is, he is chasing a chimera.. Oligarchy and meritocracy are two phases of same thing.

Reich decries those who receive most of what they have got as passive earnings, and the system does favor certain asset types , inheritances and intellectual property, which Reich enumerates as two of four roads to great wealth (the other two being forms of cheating - insider knowledge and monopoly). The road to wealth that I believe Reich finds most unpalatable, besides outright cheating, is inheritance. I would expect this from a blind believer in meritocracy.

Meritocracy rewards virtue, and has always rewarded virtue. Heirs get theirs from ancestors, back in history. This ancestors guilty of tilting our meritocratic system were, of necessity, winners in that very meritocracy. Aces of the meritocracy.. There is a phase change when the meritocratic ace’s offspring inherit his or her fortune, but the ace’s fortune is an expected outcome of the meritocracy.

That meritocracy begets oligarchy seems unremarkable to me. Reich’s problem then is his blindness to this. If oligarchy is a problem, the solution certainly cannot be meritocracy.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup