OYENTE

Michael

  • 3
  • opiniones
  • 29
  • votos útiles
  • 13
  • calificaciones

great history, horrible analysis

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-12-23

The history is very interesting and fairly detailed. The analysis at the end of the book is a bit wild and can be skipped. Throughout the book he notes multiple times how the more control a government or similar authority had in planning the worse the workers did in the long term - while not stated explicitly it is very obvious. When workers weren't getting paid enough or receiving great enough benefits, they rebelled. Fascinatingly, entrepreneurship really started from the second food production was great enough to support non worker individuals (not always for beneficial purposes).

The end of the book devolves into the author just regurgitating and citing Piquity (spelling?) who is very at odds with the detail of the book. If the end were supported by his own work rather than standard academia talking points, it would have been much more interesting.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

completely misses the point

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-21-20

The book articulates well how trade theft is done, says it could cause hundreds of billions of dollars of lost dollars to the US, and then does an about face and says the $1-2b lost from the current trade war is more serious.

Quite unfortunate misunderstanding if the facts the book lays out. Also, it is incredibly partisan at the end, I'm not sure what happened to the authors.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Incredibly biased and doesn't back up assertions

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-11-19

I've had to skip the first two sections. I've been fascinated by Japan and it's history, but this author's upfront opinions are painful and they seem to be conjecture with little fact. It's the equivalent of reading Mother Jones, Breitbart, or listening to AOC. I had to give it up after he said patents on new technology or drugs shouldn't be protected internationally - it's not fine to steal domestically, but it is fine to steal internationally?

I finally finished the rest of the book, which was quite interesting and seems to be one of the few fulsome books on the topic.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 13 personas

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup